Skip to content
CapRadio

CapRadio

listen live donate
listen live donate
listen live
donate
  • News
    • News

    • State Government
    • Environment
    • Health Care
    • Race and Equity
    • Business
    • Arts and Lifestyle
    • Food and Sustainability
    • PolitiFact California
    News
    • News

    • State Government
    • Environment
    • Health Care
    • Race and Equity
    • Business
    • Arts and Lifestyle
    • Food and Sustainability
    • PolitiFact California
  • Music
    • Music

    • Classical
    • Jazz
    • Eclectic

    • Daily Playlist
    Music
    • Music

    • Classical
    • Jazz
    • Eclectic

    • Daily Playlist
  • Podcasts & Shows
  • Schedules
  • Events
  • Support
    • Support
    • Ways to support
    • Evergreen Donation
    • One-Time Donation
    • Corporate Sponsorship
    • Vehicle Donation
    • Stock Giving
    • Legacy Giving
    • Endowment Support
    • Members
    • Member Benefits
    • Member FAQ
    • Member Newsletter

    • Fund drives
    • Drawing Winners
    • Thank You Gifts
    Support
    • Support
    • Ways to support
    • Evergreen Donation
    • One-Time Donation
    • Corporate Sponsorship
    • Vehicle Donation
    • Stock Giving
    • Legacy Giving
    • Endowment Support
    • Members
    • Member Benefits
    • Member FAQ
    • Member Newsletter

    • Fund drives
    • Drawing Winners
    • Thank You Gifts
  • About
  • Close Menu
 We Get Support From:
Become a Supporter 
 We Get Support From:
Become a Supporter 

Voters Will Decide Fate Of $7.5 Billion Water Bond

  •  Amy Quinton 
Tuesday, October 7, 2014 | Sacramento, CA
Listen
/
Update RequiredTo play audio, update browser or Flash plugin.
Amy Quinton / Capital Public Radio

Lake Oroville Reservoir. The water bond sets aside $2.7 billion for storage.

Amy Quinton / Capital Public Radio

It’s harvest time for Stan Lester, a fourth generation farmer from Winters, California in Solano County.

“My guess is it could be a three ton crop…I’m very encouraged, this looks good.”

Lester stands in his walnut orchard, watching a huge machine shaped like a giant claw shake walnuts from the trees.

1007AQ_WATERPROPp2

 

 

Lester says despite the drought, his crop looks good this year. But it hasn’t been easy.  He depends on groundwater.

“Because of the lack of rainfall and because we’ve had to put additional water on our crops to supplement the lack of rainfall, the water table never recovered,” he says.

Lester says the underground aquifer relies on surface water from rivers and streams to help replenish it. But rivers and streams are drying up. It’s one of the reasons he supports the water bond, and the $2.7 billion it sets aside for storage.

“We know weather is unpredictable in California and especially lately and so we need to set aside water and store water in these reservoirs in time of need," says Lester.

1007AQ_WATERPROPp3

 

Storage was the key sticking point in getting the legislature to pass the water bond with the two thirds vote it needed. That portion of the bond includes reservoirs and projects to clean up or store more groundwater.

Two proposed dams could receive the some of the bond money – Sites Reservoir north of Sacramento, and Temperance Flat east of Fresno.  Barbara Barrigan- Parilla with Restore the Delta says those dams are just one of the reasons they’re opposed to the bond.

“The proposed dam projects that are actually mentioned, those dams will be operated in a way to work with the tunnels and have negative impacts on the Delta,” says Barrigan-Parilla.

Legislators say they crafted the bond so that it would neither help nor hurt Governor Jerry Brown’s proposal to build twin tunnels under the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. Barrigan-Parilla says Prop 1 is not tunnel neutral.

1007AQ_WATERPROPp4

 

While the Governor and legislature, farmers, and water agencies support the bond, environmental groups are split.

“The Planning and Conservation League has been a supporter of every water bond approved by the voters for the last 20 years,” says Jonas Minton with the Planning and Conservation League.

The group isn’t taking a position on this water bond. Neither is the Sierra Club.

“In this case we’re really having to look closely at the balance of what’s good in the bond versus what’s not so good,” says Minton.

Environmentalists favor the $520 million the bond would provide for safe, clean drinking water, the $1.4 billion to protect rivers and other watersheds, and another almost $2 billion for water recycling and groundwater sustainability. 

“There is an opportunity and a need to change the way we deal with water and there are things in this bond that will help do that,” says Kathryn Phillips with the Sierra Club.

But both the Sierra Club and the Planning and Conservation League are opposed to the construction of dams, which they say would be environmentally damaging and provide a limited new supply.

The water bond doesn’t guarantee construction of dams, but Minton says it sets up a competitive process for storage projects based on their benefits.

“The criteria for what’s a benefit to be counted is recreational benefits. Well, to the best of my knowledge, you still cannot do water skiing on groundwater, so it gives a competitive advantage,” says Minton.

If the water bond does pass, it’s unlikely to end the state’s water wars. Instead, there will likely be a new debate over how to spend that storage money. Proposition 1 also comes during California’s historic drought, something that may be hard for voters to ignore.


Follow us for more stories like this

CapRadio provides a trusted source of news because of you.  As a nonprofit organization, donations from people like you sustain the journalism that allows us to discover stories that are important to our audience. If you believe in what we do and support our mission, please donate today.

Donate Today  

    More about election 2014

  • Election 2014

    Related Stories

  • Study Urges Thorough Review Of Water Storage Projects

    Thursday, November 20, 2014
    As the forecast for a wet December improves, a new study says only so much water can be stored by future dam or reservoir projects in California.

 environmentelection 2014election2014prop2014water bond

Amy Quinton

Former Environment Reporter

Amy came to Sacramento from New Hampshire Public Radio (NHPR) where she was Environment Reporter. Amy has also reported for NPR member stations WFAE in Charlotte, WAMU in Washington D.C. and American Public Media's "Marketplace."  Read Full Bio 

More Stories

Courtesy California State University

The new president of Sacramento State is also an alumnus

May 24, 2023

Courtesy of Sacramento County

Sacramento County supervisors OK 36% salary increase for themselves

May 23, 2023

AP Photo/Terry Chea

Almond hulls in your coffee? Some growers look to upcycle almond byproducts into food

May 25, 2023

We Get Support From:
Become a Supporter

Back to Top

  • CapRadio

    7055 Folsom Boulevard
    Sacramento, CA 95826-2625

    •  
      (916) 278-8900
    •  
      (877) 480-5900
    •  Contact / Feedback
    •  Submit a Tip / Story Idea
  • About

    • Mission / Vision / Core Values
    • Stations & Coverage Map
    • Careers & Internships
    • Staff Directory
    • Board of Directors
    • Press
  • Listening Options

    • Mobile Apps
    • Smart Speakers
    • Podcasts & Shows
    • On-Air Schedules
    • Daily Playlist
    • Signal Status
  • Connect

    •  Facebook
    •  Twitter
    •  Instagram
    •  YouTube
  • Donate

  • Listen Live

  • Newsletters

CapRadio stations are licensed to California State University, Sacramento. © 2023, Capital Public Radio. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Website Feedback FCC Public Files: KXJZ KKTO KUOP KQNC KXPR KXSR KXJS. For assistance accessing our public files, please call 916-278-8900 or email us.