Skip to content
CapRadio

CapRadio

signal status listen live donate
listen live donate signal status
listen live donate signal status
  • News
    • topics
    • State Government
    • Environment
    • Health Care
    • Race and Equity
    • Business
    • Arts and Lifestyle
    • Food and Sustainability
    • PolitiFact California
  • Music
    • genres
    • Classical
    • Jazz
    • Eclectic
    • Daily Playlist
  • Programs + Podcasts
    • news
    • Morning Edition
    • All Things Considered
    • Marketplace
    • Insight With Vicki Gonzalez
    • music
    • Acid Jazz
    • At the Opera
    • Classical Music
    • Connections
    • Excellence in Jazz
    • Hey, Listen!
    • K-ZAP on CapRadio
    • Mick Martin's Blues Party
    • Programs A-Z
    • Podcast Directory
  • Schedules
    • News
    • Music
    • ClassicalStream
    • JazzStream
    • Weekly Schedule
    • Daily Playlist
  • Community
    • Events Calendar
    • CapRadio Garden
    • CapRadio Reads
    • Ticket Giveaways
  • Support
    • Evergreen Gift
    • One-Time Gift
    • Corporate Support
    • Vehicle Donation
    • Stock Gift
    • Legacy Gift
    • Endowment Gift
    • Benefits
    • Member FAQ
    • e‑Newsletter
    • Drawing Winners
    • Thank You Gifts
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Close Menu
 We Get Support From:
Become a Supporter 
 We Get Support From:
Become a Supporter 
  • State Government
  •  

California Business Groups Willing To Back ‘Dynamex’ Bill — In Exchange For Exemptions

  •  Scott Rodd 
  •  Ben Adler 
Monday, April 1, 2019 | Sacramento, CA
Jessica Paterson / Flickr
 

Jessica Paterson / Flickr

A coalition of influential California business groups says it will support a bill that would codify a California Supreme Court decision that placed strict limits on classifying workers as independent contractors — if the legislation includes additional exemptions for certain professions.

“We respectfully SUPPORT if AB 5 is further AMENDED to provide a more progressive and holistic approach that fit today’s modern workforce,” the coalition stated in letters to the bill’s author and the Assembly Labor committee submitted Monday afternoon.

The letters — signed by California Chamber of Commerce, California Retailers Association and California Building Industry Association, among others — ask for broader exemptions for professionals beyond those already agreed to for doctors and insurance agents.

The coalition also seeks a broader exemption for workers “who prefer to control their own schedule,” including consultants, travel agents, and truck, taxi and “gig economy” drivers; and exempting short-term projects and business-to-business contracts.

The groups’ new position drew cautious praise from the bill’s author and supporters.

“It’s a step forward,” said the bill’s author, Asm. Lorena Gonzalez (D-San Diego). “I’m glad they’re not opposing it.”

But Gonzalez called the proposed amendments “too broad.”

“They can’t actually think I would agree to those things,” she said, adding that she will continue “to work industry-by-industry to find appropriate situations” for additional amendments and exemptions.

Gonzalez named hairdressers and real estate agents as industries she’s open to including and added that she is “interested but not sold on short-term projects.”

“The law of unintended consequences is very real,” she said. “We don’t want to start making exemptions that undercut a large portion of workers who are protected today.”

The California Supreme Court issued the ruling — commonly referred to as the “Dynamex decision” — a year ago. It stemmed from a case brought by delivery drivers who believed the company Dynamex misclassified them as independent contractors instead of employees.

The ruling laid out three criteria — known as the “ABC” test — that must be met for an employer to classify a worker as an independent contractor. A key part of the test states a worker can only be considered an independent contractor if he or she “performs work that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business.”

Workers across a range of industries — from trucking to hair styling — would likely have to be reclassified as employees instead of independent contractors. Business and industry groups have argued the decision would be disruptive and costly.

Labor groups, meanwhile, hailed the decision as a victory that would extend benefits and protections to more workers. Classifying workers as employees requires employers to pay for unemployment insurance, family leave and workers’ compensation, among other benefits and protections.

The California Labor Federation, a key supporter of the bill, says the letter shows “we’re making progress” in negotiations and says some of its proposed amendments are “reasonable points of discussion.”

“But I would also caution that there’s no desire from our end to do anything that substantially weakens the Dynamex decision itself,” says the Labor Fed’s Steve Smith. “We know that this is an incredibly complicated issue, and so that’s why we’ve been so willing to engage in discussions.”

The “support-if-amended” position demonstrates the tightrope the Chamber and business groups must walk in the Dynamex debate.

Absent a new law, the state Supreme Court ruling would apply to all industries, which is what’s driving business groups to the negotiating table.

Yet in the letters, they argue the current version of the bill would “not only (hurt) the business model of a broad swath of industries and billions of venture capital dollars that are increasingly invested in businesses, but also (hinder) California as a national leader in the innovation economy.”

A legislative source involved in negotiations called the Chamber’s new position a “clever way to split the baby. Still engaged, still asking for the moon, still not opposed.”

Read the coalition's letters here:


Follow us for more stories like this

CapRadio provides a trusted source of news because of you.  As a nonprofit organization, donations from people like you sustain the journalism that allows us to discover stories that are important to our audience. If you believe in what we do and support our mission, please donate today.

Donate Today  

    Related Stories

  • AP Photo/Charles Rex Arbogast

    Postmates — Like Uber And Lyft — Is Working With California Labor Groups To Keep Independent Contractors. Critics Aren’t Sold.

    Friday, June 14, 2019
    The gig economy giants, who use independent contractors instead of employees, have long opposed efforts to unionize their workforce. But a California Supreme Court decision and looming state legislation are forcing them to change course.
  • Richard Vogel / AP Images

    California Workers Could Sue Over Past Misclassification After Federal Court Says ‘Dynamex’ Applies Retroactively

    Wednesday, May 8, 2019
    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled last Thursday that the state’s new standard for independent contractors applies retroactively.
  • Photo courtesy of Edhuar Arellano

    As Gig Companies Beg For Relief From Pro-Labor Supreme Court Ruling, The Lobbying Is Fast And Furious

    Saturday, August 25, 2018
    Lobbyists for ride-hailing companies and the California Chamber of Commerce are scrambling to delay until next year (and the next governor's administration) a far-reaching California Supreme Court decision that could undermine the gig economy.
  • Jessica Paterson / Flickr

    Legislature Will Not Act This Year To Modernize Labor Laws For 'Gig Economy' Companies

    Wednesday, August 8, 2018
    Businesses that rely on the “gig economy” have been urging state lawmakers to overturn a California Supreme Court ruling that limits them from classifying workers as independent contractors. But legislative leaders declared the effort dead Wednesday.
  • Richard Vogel / AP Images

    California Ruling To Give More Workers Benefits, Experts Say

    Monday, April 30, 2018
    (AP) — In a big win for labor advocates, the California Supreme Court on Monday limited businesses from classifying workers as independent contractors who can't receive key employment protections.

Scott Rodd

State Government Reporter

Scott Rodd previously covered government and legal affairs for the Sacramento Business Journal. Prior to the Business Journal, Scott worked as a freelance reporter in Los Angeles and Washington, D.C.  Read Full Bio 

 @SRodd_CPR Email Scott Rodd

Ben Adler

Director of Programming and Audience Development

Director of Programming and Audience Development Ben Adler first became a public radio listener in the car on his way to preschool — though not necessarily by choice.  Read Full Bio 

Sign up for ReCap and never miss the top stories

Delivered to your inbox every Friday.

 

Check out a sample ReCap newsletter.

Thanks for subscribing!

Thank you for signing up for the ReCap newsletter! We'll send you an email each Friday with the top stories from CapRadio.

Browse all newsletters

More State Government Stories

AP Photo/Haven Daley

California’s change to concealed carry permits would reduce wide variations among counties

June 30, 2022

AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli

Deal pulls California plastic trash measure from ballot

June 30, 2022

AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli

Let’s make a deal: What to know about the California budget

June 29, 2022

Most Viewed

One dead, 4 injured in Downtown Sacramento shooting

California coronavirus updates: COVID-19 cases are increasing globally

Abortion is still legal in California. Here are answers to questions about access in the state.

Downtown Sacramento shooting: What we know and latest updates

Still testing positive after day 10? How to decide when to end your COVID isolation

We Get Support From:
Become a Supporter

Most Viewed

One dead, 4 injured in Downtown Sacramento shooting

California coronavirus updates: COVID-19 cases are increasing globally

Abortion is still legal in California. Here are answers to questions about access in the state.

Downtown Sacramento shooting: What we know and latest updates

Still testing positive after day 10? How to decide when to end your COVID isolation

Back to Top

  • CapRadio

    7055 Folsom Boulevard
    Sacramento, CA 95826-2625

    • (916) 278-8900
    • Toll-free (877) 480-5900
    • Email Us
    • Submit a News Tip
  • Contact Us

  • About Us

    • Contact Us / Feedback
    • Coverage
    • Directions
    • Careers & Internships
    • Mission / Vision / Core Values
    • Press
    • Staff Directory
    • Board of Directors
  • Listening Options

    • Mobile App
    • On Air Schedules
    • Smart Speakers
    • Playlist
    • Podcasts
    • RSS
  • Connect With Us

    •  Facebook
    •  Twitter
    •  Instagram
    •  YouTube
  • Donate

  • Listen

  • Newsletters

CapRadio stations are licensed to California State University, Sacramento. © 2022, Capital Public Radio. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Website Feedback FCC Public Files: KXJZ KKTO KUOP KQNC KXPR KXSR KXJS. For assistance accessing our public files, please call 916-278-8900 or email us.