The Assembly Democratic leadership has now added an extra $1 billion for storage projects like dams and reservoirs to its bond proposal in hopes of winning support of Republicans and Central Valley Democrats.
“These will all be open and competitive grants,” says Asm. Anthony Rendon (D-Lakewood), the proposal's author. “The whole point of this water bond package, from the outset, has been to stay away from specific earmarks.”
Asm. Brian Dahle (R-Bieber) says that’s a good start - “I’m interested in creating wet water, and that means we have to do ground water storage, surface water storage, investment in the watersheds” - but he’s still concerned there’s no guarantee that future Democratic-controlled legislatures won’t spend the storage money elsewhere.
Meantime, environmental groups and Northern California Democrats aren’t on board with the Assembly proposal either. Sen. Lois Wolk (D-Davis) represents the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta region. She says she’s open to negotiating a solution to Dahle’s concern – but storage advocates must recognize they won’t get everything they want.
“They haven’t made any compromise as far as I can see. They still want the $3 billion that was in the ’09 bond. Well, we all have to compromise. And that’s going to be a central part of the negotiation,” Wolk says.
The challenge for lawmakers is to find a sweet spot: enough money for enough different kinds of projects to get the bond measure through the legislature, but not so pricey that voters will reject it this fall. The Assembly Democratic bond proposal is now up to $8 billion; its author says he wants to keep it below $10 billion.
California state agencies have released a long-term plan for water conservation. The proposal makes permanent some emergency water conservation measures already in place to deal with the state’s drought.
California regulators hear from residents and farmers concerned about a plan to provide more water for threatened fish in the San Joaquin River and its tributaries.
The State Water Project will deliver more water to California cities and farmland in 2017 than it did this year- at least initially.
(AP) - California water agencies that spent more than $350 million in the last two years to pay property owners to rip out lawns are now trying to answer whether the nation's biggest lawn removal experiment was all worth the cost.
Five years of drought exacerbated wildfires across California. Fire and flood agencies say those burned areas now have an increased risk of flash flooding.