The Assembly Democratic leadership has now added an extra $1 billion for storage projects like dams and reservoirs to its bond proposal in hopes of winning support of Republicans and Central Valley Democrats.
“These will all be open and competitive grants,” says Asm. Anthony Rendon (D-Lakewood), the proposal's author. “The whole point of this water bond package, from the outset, has been to stay away from specific earmarks.”
Asm. Brian Dahle (R-Bieber) says that’s a good start - “I’m interested in creating wet water, and that means we have to do ground water storage, surface water storage, investment in the watersheds” - but he’s still concerned there’s no guarantee that future Democratic-controlled legislatures won’t spend the storage money elsewhere.
Meantime, environmental groups and Northern California Democrats aren’t on board with the Assembly proposal either. Sen. Lois Wolk (D-Davis) represents the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta region. She says she’s open to negotiating a solution to Dahle’s concern – but storage advocates must recognize they won’t get everything they want.
“They haven’t made any compromise as far as I can see. They still want the $3 billion that was in the ’09 bond. Well, we all have to compromise. And that’s going to be a central part of the negotiation,” Wolk says.
The challenge for lawmakers is to find a sweet spot: enough money for enough different kinds of projects to get the bond measure through the legislature, but not so pricey that voters will reject it this fall. The Assembly Democratic bond proposal is now up to $8 billion; its author says he wants to keep it below $10 billion.
California's drought is blamed for a big downturn in honey production.
Researchers say California has been overdrawing its water account for a century.
Researchers at UC Davis fear that California’s drought may soon claim its first victim, the Red Hills Roach. The tiny fish is losing its water. Scientists fear it may soon be pushed to extinction.
A UC Davis report shows the drought has brought positive and negative effects to Lake Tahoe.
California's farm production costs totaled $36.6 billion in 2013, an 8.6 percent jump from the previous year. Higher rates for feed, labor, improvements and water contributed to the jump.