Skip to content
CapRadio

CapRadio

listen live donate
listen live donate
listen live
donate
  • News
    • News

    • State Government
    • Environment
    • Health Care
    • Race and Equity
    • Business
    • Arts and Lifestyle
    • Food and Sustainability
    • PolitiFact California
    News
    • News

    • State Government
    • Environment
    • Health Care
    • Race and Equity
    • Business
    • Arts and Lifestyle
    • Food and Sustainability
    • PolitiFact California
  • Music
    • Music

    • Classical
    • Jazz
    • Eclectic

    • Daily Playlist
    Music
    • Music

    • Classical
    • Jazz
    • Eclectic

    • Daily Playlist
  • Podcasts & Shows
  • Schedules
  • Events
  • Support
    • Support
    • Ways to support
    • Evergreen Donation
    • One-Time Donation
    • Corporate Sponsorship
    • Vehicle Donation
    • Stock Giving
    • Legacy Giving
    • Endowment Support
    • Members
    • Member Benefits
    • Member FAQ
    • Member Newsletter

    • Fund drives
    • Drawing Winners
    • Thank You Gifts
    Support
    • Support
    • Ways to support
    • Evergreen Donation
    • One-Time Donation
    • Corporate Sponsorship
    • Vehicle Donation
    • Stock Giving
    • Legacy Giving
    • Endowment Support
    • Members
    • Member Benefits
    • Member FAQ
    • Member Newsletter

    • Fund drives
    • Drawing Winners
    • Thank You Gifts
  • About
  • Close Menu
 We Get Support From:
Become a Supporter 
 We Get Support From:
Become a Supporter 
  • State Government
  •  

California Legislature's #MeToo Bills Draw Opposition From Business Groups

  •  Ben Adler 
Tuesday, August 14, 2018 | Sacramento, CA
Listen
/
Update RequiredTo play audio, update browser or Flash plugin.
Andrew Nixon / Capital Public Radio

The California State Capitol on September 12, 2017.

Andrew Nixon / Capital Public Radio

Less than a year after the Me Too and “We Said Enough” movements reverberated around California’s Capitol, a pack of bills that seek to address sexual harassment in the workplace is drawing pushback from business groups that fear a sharp increase in lawsuits.

Among them: efforts to ban nondisclosure and limit nondisparagement agreements, end forced arbitration, make harassers personally liable, and extend the statute of limitations to file a claim with the state.

“As employers, you want to protect your workforce and the employees that you have working for you,” said Jennifer Barrera with the California Chamber of Commerce. But she said the confusion and litigation that would follow the new mandates “is what is concerning to employers, who are trying to do the right thing but nonetheless could wind up facing a lawsuit in court.”

One measure, AB 3080 by Asm. Lorena Gonzalez Fletcher (D-San Diego), would ban employers from requiring workers to participate in private arbitration to settle disputes such as sexual harassment claims, rather than going to court.

“Right now, workers basically have no option but to sign a forced arbitration agreement as a condition of employment,” said Mariko Yoshihara with the California Employment Lawyers Association, one of the bill’s supporters. “If we can’t at least give workers the option to say no, then what’s the point of having the laws that we do … if workers can’t even enforce them in the courts?”

CalChamber has placed the bill on its “job killer” list, which has historically held great sway with moderate Democrats, as well as Gov. Jerry Brown.

“It has been couched and presented as a sexual harassment bill as a part of the Me Too movement, but it’s really much broader than that,” Barrera said.

She notes the measure applies to “any claim under the labor code and any claim under the Fair Employment and Housing Act, which is obviously much more than just sexual harassment claims.”

Examples of claims that Barrera said could be forced into court include rest and meal breaks, sick leave and discrimination claims that aren’t related to sexual harassment.

“It not only creates massive confusion for employers attempting to comply with the law, but it also creates immense opportunity for trial lawyers to sue,” John Kabateck with the National Federation of Independent Businesses wrote in a statement.

But the measure has already passed the Assembly, which is seen as having a stronger bloc of moderates. Unless it’s amended, it need only win Senate approval before advancing to the governor’s desk.

Another bill, SB 1300 by Sen. Hannah-Beth Jackson (D-Santa Barbara), is also on the Chamber’s job killer list. It would prohibit employers from requiring workers to sign away two rights as a condition of employment or receiving a raise: nondisparagement agreements that block victims from speaking publicly, and filing legal claims.

However, under the law, those agreements could still be signed as part of a settlement — a common practice in exchange for a severance package.

Jackson says her measure would prohibit “underhanded legal tactics that prevent victims from speaking out about sexual harassment and seeking justice in our courts.”

The Chamber opposes the bill but is preparing to withdraw its “job killer” label after Jackson removes a separate provision from the measure. It must still pass both the Assembly and Senate.

Two other bills by Sen. Connie Leyva (D-Chino) are also active in the Legislature’s final weeks of session.

SB 820 would ban the use of nondisclosure agreements in sexual harassment, assault and discrimination cases. And SB 1038 would make harassers personally liable for retaliating against anyone who filed a claim against them. Both measures require both Assembly and Senate approval.

“This bill will make sure that if you retaliate against someone who comes forward for sexual harassment … you can be held accountable for your actions,” Leyva said at Wednesday’s news conference, arguing that most victims do not report incidents because “they fear retaliation.”

And AB 1870, by Asm. Eloise Gómez Reyes (D-Grand Terrace), would extend the deadline to file a harassment or discrimination complaint with the state Department of Fair Employment and Housing from one year after an incident occured to three. This measure only needs a final vote in the Senate.

The Chamber withdrew its opposition to SB 1038 earlier this summer but opposes the other measures.


Follow us for more stories like this

CapRadio provides a trusted source of news because of you.  As a nonprofit organization, donations from people like you sustain the journalism that allows us to discover stories that are important to our audience. If you believe in what we do and support our mission, please donate today.

Donate Today  

    Related Stories

  • Bob Moffitt / Capital Public Radio

    California Lawmakers Limit Nondisclosure Agreements

    Wednesday, August 22, 2018
    California would bar forced arbitration and nondisclosure agreements under a bill sent to Gov. Jerry Brown on Wednesday that enjoys celebrity backing from some in the #MeToo movement.
  • Andrew Nixon / Capital Public Radio / File

    Capitol Chat: Time’s Running Out For These State Bills

    Thursday, August 16, 2018
    The California state legislative session only has three weeks left, but lawmakers have yet to decide the fate of several important bills.

 MeToo

Ben Adler

Director of Programming and Audience Development

Director of Programming and Audience Development Ben Adler first became a public radio listener in the car on his way to preschool — though not necessarily by choice.  Read Full Bio 

Sign up for ReCap and never miss the top stories

Delivered to your inbox every Friday.

 

Check out a sample ReCap newsletter.

Thanks for subscribing!

Thank you for signing up for the ReCap newsletter! We'll send you an email each Friday with the top stories from CapRadio.

Browse all newsletters

More State Government Stories

Stephanie Hughes

Garbology is the study of trash. This is why students love it

March 24, 2023

Photo by Larry Valenzuela, CalMatters/CatchLight Local

State may scale down its new home loan program designed to assist first-time homebuyers

March 22, 2023

Rich Pedroncelli / AP Photo

Proposed bill would overhaul referendum petition process in California

March 22, 2023

Most Viewed

Sacramento plans to debut hundreds of tiny homes. Will they help people move off the streets?

State may scale down its new home loan program designed to assist first-time homebuyers

The Sacramento Kings could clinch a spot in the playoffs Monday night. Here’s how.

10 new California laws that go into effect in 2023

California coronavirus updates: Looking to travel as some countries ease pandemic restrictions? Order your passports soon.

We Get Support From:
Become a Supporter

Most Viewed

Sacramento plans to debut hundreds of tiny homes. Will they help people move off the streets?

State may scale down its new home loan program designed to assist first-time homebuyers

The Sacramento Kings could clinch a spot in the playoffs Monday night. Here’s how.

10 new California laws that go into effect in 2023

California coronavirus updates: Looking to travel as some countries ease pandemic restrictions? Order your passports soon.

Back to Top

  • CapRadio

    7055 Folsom Boulevard
    Sacramento, CA 95826-2625

    •  
      (916) 278-8900
    •  
      (877) 480-5900
    •  Contact / Feedback
    •  Submit a Tip / Story Idea
  • About

    • Mission / Vision / Core Values
    • Stations & Coverage Map
    • Careers & Internships
    • Staff Directory
    • Board of Directors
    • Press
  • Listening Options

    • Mobile Apps
    • Smart Speakers
    • Podcasts & Shows
    • On-Air Schedules
    • Daily Playlist
    • Signal Status
  • Connect

    •  Facebook
    •  Twitter
    •  Instagram
    •  YouTube
  • Donate

  • Listen Live

  • Newsletters

CapRadio stations are licensed to California State University, Sacramento. © 2023, Capital Public Radio. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Website Feedback FCC Public Files: KXJZ KKTO KUOP KQNC KXPR KXSR KXJS. For assistance accessing our public files, please call 916-278-8900 or email us.