Skip to content
CapRadio

CapRadio

listen live donate
listen live donate
listen live
donate
  • News
    • News

    • State Government
    • Environment
    • Health Care
    • Race and Equity
    • Business
    • Arts and Lifestyle
    • Food and Sustainability
    • PolitiFact California
    News
    • News

    • State Government
    • Environment
    • Health Care
    • Race and Equity
    • Business
    • Arts and Lifestyle
    • Food and Sustainability
    • PolitiFact California
  • Music
    • Music

    • Classical
    • Jazz
    • Eclectic

    • Daily Playlist
    Music
    • Music

    • Classical
    • Jazz
    • Eclectic

    • Daily Playlist
  • Podcasts & Shows
  • Schedules
  • Events
  • Support
    • Support
    • Ways to support
    • Evergreen Donation
    • One-Time Donation
    • Corporate Sponsorship
    • Vehicle Donation
    • Stock Giving
    • Legacy Giving
    • Endowment Support
    • Members
    • Member Benefits
    • Member FAQ
    • Member Newsletter

    • Fund drives
    • Drawing Winners
    • Thank You Gifts
    Support
    • Support
    • Ways to support
    • Evergreen Donation
    • One-Time Donation
    • Corporate Sponsorship
    • Vehicle Donation
    • Stock Giving
    • Legacy Giving
    • Endowment Support
    • Members
    • Member Benefits
    • Member FAQ
    • Member Newsletter

    • Fund drives
    • Drawing Winners
    • Thank You Gifts
  • About
  • Close Menu
 We Get Support From:
Become a Supporter 
 We Get Support From:
Become a Supporter 

Proposition 46 Has Attorneys and Physicians At Odds

  •  Pauline Bartolone 
Friday, October 10, 2014 | Sacramento, CA
Listen
/
Update RequiredTo play audio, update browser or Flash plugin.
  

As the November election approaches, one state proposition has drawn the most money from top contributors. Proposition 46 would raise the cap on pain and suffering damages in medical malpractice cases. But, the measure could change the way doctors practice.  

Proposition 46 is actually three measures in one. It would require drug testing of doctors. It would require physicians to check a database before prescribing patients addictive substances. And it would raise the limit on damages awarded in medical malpractice suits. If that seems like a lot to take in, Consumer Watchdog’s Carmen Balber says the measure was deliberately written that way.   

“You write a measure so it will be successful at the polls," says Balber. "The stupidest thing you can do in an initiative campaign is write an initiative that the public doesn’t understand and doesn’t want."

But opponents say the measure is ‘carelessly thrown together.’

“This initiative is really about raising the cap, and everything else is just a distraction," says Dr. Ruth Haskins, with the California Medical Association.

The ‘cap’ is the $250,000 limit on pain and suffering awards in medical malpractice suits. It was set in 1975 under MICRA – The Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act.  Prop 46 would raise the cap to over $1 million. Haskins says that would make medical liability premiums go up.

“Physicians just won’t be able to afford to practice medicine in California," she says.

The California Medical Association says governments and taxpayers will pay more too. Haskins, who is a obstetrician and gynecologist, says it would make doctors like her change the way they practice to avoid lawsuits.

“If this passes, I might be saying, ‘let’s order that ultrasound now to see if there’s a problem’ and that ultrasound is going to be an increased cost to the medical health care system," says Haskins.

But attorneys say the current cap on damages already affects how they work. Sacramento law firm Kershaw, Cutter & Ratinoff says the cap forces lawyers to make business decisions about medical malpractice cases.

“We probably take 5 percent or less of the cases that are presented to us," says Attorney J.R. Parker.

He says it costs tens of thousands of dollars to build a case. So most of their cases involve the prospect of significant financial awards. Young people whose injuries have prevented them from working, or people who require lifetime medical care. MICRA does not cap those economic losses. Parker says he’s extremely selective about pain and suffering cases.

“Wrongful death cases are one of the best examples," he says. "Where, even if you’ve got a lost grandfather or a lost child, there’s no real loss of earning capacity that anyone could attach to that death. So the grizzly reality of MICRA is that those cases are only worth $250,000.”

Parker says those limitations don’t apply with other causes of injury.

“The same kinds of injury that happen to be caused by a defective product or a truck driver that falls asleep, or any number of circumstances where someone is negligent, doesn’t do what they were supposed to do, and someone is injured as a result, the jury gets to decide how much that injury is worth in terms of pain and suffering," he says.

Lifting the damage cap has been considered in the legislature without success.  Wesley Hussey, Government Professor at Sacramento State University says that’s typically the point at which proponents take a measure to voters. He says the drug testing and the prescription drug database aspects of Prop 46 are ‘sweeteners’ added to win public favor.

“So it’s really about changing MICRA, but we’ve found over the years that kind of complicated technical issues like that don’t work well with the voters, so proponents have found something that’s easier to talk about… kind of bring voters in on that issue, and they get what they really want, which is the change to MICRA," says Hussey.

He says ‘sweeteners’ aren’t inherently bad – but they don’t always work. They can confuse voters, and confused voters often vote no.  

“They’re very good at making decisions on social issues, where it’s just basically their values and their preferences, but kind of complicated and technical issues, voters don’t understand it," he says. "And throwing money around to scare them or convince them to vote for it, that’s how propositions work often sadly in California.”

Lifting the cap would allow attorneys to earn more money on cases. Doctors are concerned about costs to their industry. Both professions bring in an average salary of more than $150,000 a year.


Follow us for more stories like this

CapRadio provides a trusted source of news because of you.  As a nonprofit organization, donations from people like you sustain the journalism that allows us to discover stories that are important to our audience. If you believe in what we do and support our mission, please donate today.

Donate Today  

    More about election 2014

  • Election 2014

 election 2014prop2014Proposition 46

Pauline Bartolone

Former Editor-at-Large

Pauline’s been a journalist for two decades, covering health care, education and the many disparities that exist in California.  Read Full Bio 

Sign up for ReCap and never miss the top stories

Delivered to your inbox every Friday.

 

Check out a sample ReCap newsletter.

Thanks for subscribing!

Thank you for signing up for the ReCap newsletter! We'll send you an email each Friday with the top stories from CapRadio.

Browse all newsletters

More Stories

Photo by Larry Valenzuela, CalMatters/CatchLight Local

State may scale down its new home loan program designed to assist first-time homebuyers

March 22, 2023

Mario Tama/Getty Images

It's not just Adderall: The number of drugs in short supply rose by 30% last year

March 24, 2023

Andrew Nixon/CapRadio

Another atmospheric river brings more rain, wind and snow to Northern California

March 28, 2023

Most Viewed

State may scale down its new home loan program designed to assist first-time homebuyers

California coronavirus updates: Americans' life expectancy has dropped to 76 years, second time in a row since pandemic

Assembly approves oil profit penalty bill, sending it to Newsom

Cooking with gas — or electricity? Californians wonder how electrification might impact the food we eat

Another atmospheric river brings more rain, wind and snow to Northern California

We Get Support From:
Become a Supporter

Most Viewed

State may scale down its new home loan program designed to assist first-time homebuyers

California coronavirus updates: Americans' life expectancy has dropped to 76 years, second time in a row since pandemic

Assembly approves oil profit penalty bill, sending it to Newsom

Cooking with gas — or electricity? Californians wonder how electrification might impact the food we eat

Another atmospheric river brings more rain, wind and snow to Northern California

Back to Top

  • CapRadio

    7055 Folsom Boulevard
    Sacramento, CA 95826-2625

    •  
      (916) 278-8900
    •  
      (877) 480-5900
    •  Contact / Feedback
    •  Submit a Tip / Story Idea
  • About

    • Mission / Vision / Core Values
    • Stations & Coverage Map
    • Careers & Internships
    • Staff Directory
    • Board of Directors
    • Press
  • Listening Options

    • Mobile Apps
    • Smart Speakers
    • Podcasts & Shows
    • On-Air Schedules
    • Daily Playlist
    • Signal Status
  • Connect

    •  Facebook
    •  Twitter
    •  Instagram
    •  YouTube
  • Donate

  • Listen Live

  • Newsletters

CapRadio stations are licensed to California State University, Sacramento. © 2023, Capital Public Radio. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Website Feedback FCC Public Files: KXJZ KKTO KUOP KQNC KXPR KXSR KXJS. For assistance accessing our public files, please call 916-278-8900 or email us.